<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the Hell do You Want From Me???!?!  &#8230;can I undo that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.syzlaksem.com/2007/what-the-hell-do-you-want-from-me-can-i-undo-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.syzlaksem.com/2007/what-the-hell-do-you-want-from-me-can-i-undo-that/</link>
	<description>A simple man’s look into the world of SEM</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SEO Hack</title>
		<link>http://www.syzlaksem.com/2007/what-the-hell-do-you-want-from-me-can-i-undo-that/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 06:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.syzlaksem.com/2007/what-the-hell-do-you-want-from-me-can-i-undo-that/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>oh, and hey, i thought u said www. was for losers.  What gives with www.syzlaksem.com?  why no syzlaksem.com?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, and hey, i thought u said <a href="http://www" rel="nofollow">http://www</a>. was for losers.  What gives with <a href="http://www.syzlaksem.com?" rel="nofollow">http://www.syzlaksem.com?</a>  why no syzlaksem.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Hack</title>
		<link>http://www.syzlaksem.com/2007/what-the-hell-do-you-want-from-me-can-i-undo-that/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 05:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.syzlaksem.com/2007/what-the-hell-do-you-want-from-me-can-i-undo-that/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>oh boo hoo.  your tummy hurts.  now go write some more, dammit!

I so agree with the undo save.  they can figure out to suck really bad at the interwebs but not an undo save?  c'mon!  must have something to do with keeping a huge cache of changes or something and that dragging down performance.  But i'm sure Google could figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh boo hoo.  your tummy hurts.  now go write some more, dammit!</p>
<p>I so agree with the undo save.  they can figure out to suck really bad at the interwebs but not an undo save?  c&#8217;mon!  must have something to do with keeping a huge cache of changes or something and that dragging down performance.  But i&#8217;m sure Google could figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
